Editorial standards

How AI Anonymous decides what to publish, how claims get sourced, and what we do when we get something wrong.

Sourcing

Every statistic links to its primary source. The study, the government table, the company filing, not to an article about it. If a claim cannot be traced to a source we can link, it does not run.

Each page shows when it was published. Where a page has been meaningfully updated. New data, a new section, a corrected figure, it shows an updated date too. We do not refresh dates cosmetically.

Health and mental-health content

We write about AI psychosis, AI addiction and chatbot-as-therapy because people are searching for them and the coverage is poor. We are journalists, not clinicians. Those pages carry a disclaimer, keep crisis resources visible, and do not claim clinical review unless a named clinician has actually reviewed them.

Money

Affiliate links are disclosed on the page where they appear, not just in the footer, and are marked rel="sponsored". Editorial citations are never affiliate links. We do not take payment to recommend a mental-health service.

We use AI tools in research and drafting. A human editor is responsible for every published page, checks every source link, and is named on it.

Corrections

Corrections are made on the page, with a note saying what changed. Report one via contact.